Text eingebunden aus COM:FOP Switzerland Schweiz OK. if they are part of a collective work, in a catalog, but not in digital form.if the purpose is to advertise an exhibition and sale of works of art, but only to the extent necessary to promote the exhibition or sale, or.if they are permanently located on, or at a public outdoor location,.The exception reads as follows: Works of fine art may be reproduced in pictorial form It is thus a question of a much greater restriction on their exclusive right than what the provision aims at.īefore the ruling, it was widely believed that the exception in § 24 of the Swedish copyright law applied, permitting depiction of works of art. However, a database of the current type allows for a large use of copyrighted works, without any compensation being paid to the authors. This purpose is in itself within the framework of what can be seen as a public interest. This is a trade-off in relation to the purpose that the database is to serve (see p. Point 21 of the ruling of the Swedish Supreme Court.Ģ1. Det blir därmed fråga om en betydligt större inskränkning i deras ensamrätt än vad bestämmelsen syftar till. En databas av nu aktuellt slag öppnar emellertid för en stor användning av upphovsrättsligt skyddade verk, utan att någon ersättning betalas till upphovsmännen. Detta syfte ligger i och för sig inom ramen för vad som kan ses som ett allmänt intresse. Det handlar här om en avvägning i förhållande till det syfte som databasen ska tillgodose (se p. The supreme court also used the requisite of a database for the ruling, not the publication of the images by themselves.Ģ1. The reason BUS chose to target the site "" and not Wikimedia Commons was (probably) the fact that it made an intrusion to a right previously negotiated between BUS and the municipalities of Sweden (owners of the public art). De hänskjutna frågorna ska besvaras i enlighet med detta.Įrror: No text given for quotation (or equals sign used in the actual argument to an unnamed parameter) Huruvida förfogandet sker i kommersiellt syfte saknar betydelse. Bestämmelsen i 24 § första stycket 1 upphovsrättslagen, där inskränkningen i upphovsmannens ensamrätt är begränsad till avbildningar, ger inte Wikimedia rätt att från sin databas med fotografier av konstverk, stadigvarande placerade på eller vid allmän plats utomhus, överföra verken via internet till allmänheten. Under Act 1960:729 with consolidated amendments up to Act (2017:323) Article 24, the first paragraph of which ('works of art.') was ruled not to apply to online publication:Ģ3. Most free images currently hosted on French Wikipedia should be transferred to Commons, so that French Wikipedia will only host non-free copyrighted materials subject to these restrictions: this will allow remote proxies or Wikipedia contents aggregators, or other linguistic editions of Wikipedia to block these images, even if they display the rest of articles embedding these non-free illustration images, only by looking at the prefix of their URL on the image servers (instead of displaying these images, they can display only their textual description with a direct link to the French Wikipedia article showing these images covered by this exception).These images should not be integrated in templates reusable in an unbound number of pages. The image description page will also display the full list of local pages (most often only one) embedding for their illustration a very limited number of such medias (images in galleries showing all artistic and creative aspect of the same copyrighted subject should not be integrated in these French Wikipedia articles: generally a single illustration is enough).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |